4.7 Article

Graph Optimization Approach to Range-Based Localization

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS
Volume 51, Issue 11, Pages 6830-6841

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2020.2964713

Keywords

Time measurement; Optimization; Mobile robots; Trajectory; Simultaneous localization and mapping; Estimation; Graph optimization approach; range-based localization; two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) spaces; ultrawide band radio

Funding

  1. ST EngineeringNTU Corporate Laboratory under the NRF Corporate Lab, University Scheme
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61720106011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a graph optimization-based framework for localization, with a focus on range-based localization. By constraining the robot trajectory within a sliding window, the algorithm aims to improve localization accuracy. Extensive experiments on quadcopters demonstrate higher accuracy compared to existing range-based methods, especially in the altitude direction.
In this article, we propose a general graph optimization-based framework for localization, which can accommodate different types of measurements with varying measurement time intervals. Special emphasis will be on range-based localization. Range and trajectory smoothness constraints are constructed in a position graph, then the robot trajectory over a sliding window is estimated by a graph-based optimization algorithm. Moreover, convergence analysis of the algorithm is provided, and the effects of the number of iterations and window size in the optimization on the localization accuracy are analyzed. Extensive experiments on quadcopter under a variety of scenarios verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and demonstrate a much higher localization accuracy than the existing range-based localization methods, especially in the altitude direction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available