4.5 Article

Understanding the Interplay Between CdSe Thickness and Cu Doping Temperature in CdSe/CdTe Devices

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 11-15

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3110338

Keywords

II-VI semiconductor materials; Cadmium compounds; Doping; Photonic band gap; Annealing; Performance evaluation; Photovoltaic systems; CdTe; CuCl_2; evaporation; photovoltaics; solar cells

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE's office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) [DE-EE0008974]
  2. Air Force Research Laboratory [FA9453-18-2-0037, FA9453-19-C-1002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CdSe thickness and Cu doping are crucial for achieving high efficiency in CdTe solar cells. CdSe thickness plays a significant role in device performance, with a critical thickness determined at 120 nm. Increasing the Cu doping process temperature can lead to an increase in CdSe thickness and overall device efficiency improvement.
CdSe thickness and Cu doping play significant roles in achieving high efficiency in CdTe solar cells. Using an evaporated CdSe/CdTe device stack to avoid vacuum breaks between deposition of layers, we investigated the role of the CdSe thickness on the device performance. When the CdSe thickness was greater than a critical value the device performance suffered primarily due to a reduction in the short-circuit current density (J$_SC$). The critical thickness of CdSe was determined to be 120 nm. However, in some cases the CdSe thicknesses could be increased to larger values by increasing the Cu doping process temperature. The higher temperature process leads to an increase in J$_SC$ and an overall improvement in device efficiency. Specifically, for a device with similar to 270 nm of CdSe, the J$_SC$ increased from 7.9 mAcm-2 with CuCl$_2$ processing temperature of 200 degrees C to similar to 29 mAcm-2 when the processing temperature was increased to 250 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available