4.2 Article

Contribution of motor and proprioceptive information to visuotactile interaction in peripersonal space during bike riding

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 240, Issue 2, Pages 491-501

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06269-4

Keywords

Peripersonal space; Visuotactile interaction; Self-motion perception; Proprioception; Motor command

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [JP19H00631, JP19H04145, JP20H05801]
  2. Cooperative Research Project of the Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the construction of peripersonal space (PPS) and the response to dynamic cues using a pedaling bike experiment. The results suggest that motor cues may influence the representation of PPS, but the dynamic information in these cues may have little impact.
The space immediately around the body, known as the peripersonal space (PPS), plays an important role in interactions with the environment. Specific representations are reported to be constructed in the brain. PPS expansion reportedly occurs during whole-body self-motions, such as walking; however, little is known regarding how dynamic cues in proprioceptive/motor information contribute to such phenomena. Thus, we investigated this issue using a pedaling bike situation. We defined PPS as the maximum distance at which a visual probe facilitated tactile detection at the chest. Experiment 1 compared two conditions where participants did or did not pedal the bike at a constant speed while observing an optic flow that simulated forward self-motion (pedaling and no pedaling). Experiment 2 investigated the effect of pedal resistances (high and low) while presenting the same optic flow as in Experiment 1. The results revealed that the reaction time (RT) difference (probe RT - baseline RT) was larger for the pedaling than for the no-pedaling condition. However, pedal resistance differences hardly affected the visuotactile interaction, although the participants clearly experienced differences in force. These results suggest that proprioceptive/motor cues can contribute to the modulation of PPS representation, but dynamic information included in these cues may have little influence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available