4.8 Article

An estimate of the deepest branches of the tree of life from ancient vertically evolving genes

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.66695

Keywords

phylogenetics; tree of life; microbial diversity; molecular evolution; None

Categories

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF9741]
  2. Royal Society [RGF\EA\180199, URF\R\201024]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/P00251X/1]
  4. H2020 European Research Council [714774, GINOP-2.3.2.-15-2016-00057, 947317]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2016-03559]
  6. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research
  7. NERC [NE/P00251X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [947317] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Core gene phylogenies are important for understanding early evolution, but different gene sets and methods have led to different views of the tree of life. Recent analyses suggest that Archaea may be less divergent from Bacteria than previously thought, and estimates of inter-domain distance are inflated due to rapid evolution of ribosomal proteins. Resolving this debate is crucial for understanding the diversity of archaeal and bacterial domains and the early course of cellular evolution.
Core gene phylogenies provide a window into early evolution, but different gene sets and analytical methods have yielded substantially different views of the tree of life. Trees inferred from a small set of universal core genes have typically supported a long branch separating the archaeal and bacterial domains. By contrast, recent analyses of a broader set of non-ribosomal genes have suggested that Archaea may be less divergent from Bacteria, and that estimates of inter-domain distance are inflated due to accelerated evolution of ribosomal proteins along the inter-domain branch. Resolving this debate is key to determining the diversity of the archaeal and bacterial domains, the shape of the tree of life, and our understanding of the early course of cellular evolution. Here, we investigate the evolutionary history of the marker genes key to the debate. We show that estimates of a reduced Archaea-Bacteria (AB) branch length result from inter-domain gene transfers and hidden paralogy in the expanded marker gene set. By contrast, analysis of a broad range of manually curated marker gene datasets from an evenly sampled set of 700 Archaea and Bacteria reveals that current methods likely underestimate the AB branch length due to substitutional saturation and poor model fit; that the best-performing phylogenetic markers tend to support longer inter-domain branch lengths; and that the AB branch lengths of ribosomal and non-ribosomal marker genes are statistically indistinguishable. Furthermore, our phylogeny inferred from the 27 highest-ranked marker genes recovers a clade of DPANN at the base of the Archaea and places the bacterial Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR) within Bacteria as the sister group to the Chloroflexota.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available