4.8 Article

Pupil diameter is not an accurate real-time readout of locus coeruleus activity

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.70510

Keywords

locus coeruleus; pupil diameter; brain state; Mouse

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R01NS112200, R01NS107355]
  2. University of California, Riverside
  3. University of California
  4. Esther A and Joseph Klingenstein Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pupil diameter is often used as a noninvasive measure of locus coeruleus (LC) activity. However, there is substantial variability in the relationship between pupil diameter and LC activity, limiting its accuracy in predicting LC activity. Additionally, pupil responses to optical stimulation in the LC show session-to-session fluctuations, and these variations are correlated with decision bias-related behavioral variables.
Pupil diameter is often treated as a noninvasive readout of activity in the locus coeruleus (LC). However, how accurately it can be used to index LC activity is not known. To address this question, we established a graded relationship between pupil size changes and LC spiking activity in mice, where pupil dilation increased monotonically with the number of LC spikes. However, this relationship exists with substantial variability such that pupil diameter can only be used to accurately predict a small fraction of LC activity on a moment-by-moment basis. In addition, pupil exhibited large session-to-session fluctuations in response to identical optical stimulation in the LC. The variations in the pupil-LC relationship were strongly correlated with decision bias-related behavioral variables. Together, our data show that substantial variability exists in an overall graded relationship between pupil diameter and LC activity, and further suggest that the pupil-LC relationship is dynamically modulated by brain states, supporting and extending our previous findings (Yang et al., 2021).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available