4.7 Article

Practices and perspectives of primary care physicians in Japan and the United States about diagnosing dementia: a qualitative study

Journal

BMC GERIATRICS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02457-7

Keywords

Diagnosing dementia; Primary care physicians; Japan; United States; Qualitative comparison

Funding

  1. Pfizer Health Research Foundation
  2. Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
  3. Michigan Center on the Demography of Aging [NIA P30AG012846]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary care physicians in Japan and the US have similar practices and views on diagnosing dementia, but there are differences in the timing of formal diagnosis. Japanese physicians tend to wait until family members need long-term care services for a formal diagnosis, while American physicians are more proactive in screening for dementia early and promoting advance directives while patients still have decision-making capabilities.
Background While dementia is a common problem in Japan and the US, primary care physicians' practices and perspectives about diagnosing dementia in these different healthcare systems are unknown. Methods Qualitative research was conducted in an ethnographic tradition using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis in primary care settings across Japan and in the Midwest State of Michigan, US. Participants were a total of 48 primary care physicians, 24 each from Japan and the US participated. Both groups contained a mixture of geographic areas (rural/urban), gender, age, and years of experience as primary care physicians. Results Participants in Japan and the US voiced similar practices for making the diagnosis of dementia and held similar views about the desired benefits of diagnosing dementia. Differences were found in attitudes about the appropriate timing of formally diagnosing dementia. Japanese physicians tended to make a formal diagnosis when problems that would benefit from long-term care services emerged for family members. US physicians were more proactive in diagnosing dementia in the early stages by screening for dementia in health check-ups and promoting advance directives when the patients were still capable of decision-making. Views about appropriate timing of diagnostic testing for dementia in the two systems reflect what medical or nursing care services physicians can use to support dementia patients and caregivers. Conclusions Benefits of making the diagnosis included the need to activate the long-term care services in Japan and for early intervention and authoring advance directives in the US. Testing to establish an early diagnosis of dementia by primary care physicians only partly relates to testing and treatment options available. Benefits of making the diagnosis included the need to activate the long-term care services in Japan and for early intervention and authoring advance directives in the US.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available