4.7 Article

Barriers and facilitators for implementation of a complex health services intervention in long-term care homes: a qualitative study using focus groups

Journal

BMC GERIATRICS
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02579-y

Keywords

Barriers; Facilitators; Nursing homes; Focus groups; Qualitative study; Coordinated medical care; Elderly; Primary care; Complex health intervention; Implementation research

Funding

  1. Innovation Committee at the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), Germany [NVF1_2016-080]
  2. Baden-Wuerttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Art
  3. Projekt DEAL
  4. University of Freiburg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the implementation of CoCare in nursing homes in Germany, aiming to improve medical care coordination for elderly residents. Findings reveal barriers such as understaffing, bureaucracy, and structural issues, while communication and collaboration are identified as key facilitators. Stakeholders perceive CoCare as a team-building intervention with the potential to overcome existing challenges and improve care quality.
Background: With rising numbers of elderly people living in nursing homes in Germany, the need for on-site primary care is increasing. A lack of primary care in nursing homes can lead to unnecessary hospitalization, higher mortality, and morbidity in the elderly. The project CoCare (coordinated medical care) has therefore implemented a complex health intervention in nursing homes, using inter alia, regular medical rounds, a shared patient medical record and medication checks, with the aim of improving the coordination of medical care. This study reports upon the results of a qualitative study assessing the perceived barriers and facilitators of the implementation of CoCare by stakeholders. Methods: Focus group interviews were held between October 2018 and November 2019 with nurses, general practitioners and GP's assistants working or consulting in a participating nursing home. A semi-structured modular guideline was used to ask participants for their opinion on different aspects of CoCare and which barriers and facilitators they perceived. Focus groups were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: In total, N = 11 focus group interviews with N = 74 participants were conducted. We found six themes describing barriers and facilitators in respect of the implementation of CoCare: understaffing, bureaucracy, complexity, structural barriers, financial compensation, communication and collaboration. Furthermore, participants described the incorporation of the intervention into standard care. Conclusion: Barriers perceived by stakeholders are well known in the literature (e.g. understaffing and complexity). However, CoCare provides a good structure to overcome barriers and some barriers will dissolve after implementation into routine care (e.g. bureaucracy). In contrast, especially communication and collaboration were perceived as facilitators in CoCare, with the project being received as a team building intervention itself.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available