4.5 Article

A GPU-Accelerated Radiation Transfer Model Using the Lattice Boltzmann Method

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos12101316

Keywords

radiative transfer modeling; lattice Boltzmann method; GPU computing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A three-dimensional radiation model based on lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) is developed and implemented on GPU for accelerated computation speed in simulating radiative transfer in the atmosphere. The model, named RT-LBM, shows high accuracy and computational efficiency compared to Monte Carlo method (MCM) simulations, running significantly faster on both CPU and GPU platforms.
A prototype of a three-dimensional (3-D) radiation model is developed using the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) and implemented on a graphical processing unit (GPU) to accelerate the model's computational speed. This radiative transfer-lattice Boltzmann model (RT-LBM) results from a discretization of the radiative transfer equation in time, space, and solid angle. The collision and streaming computation algorithm, widely used in LBM for fluid flow modeling, is applied to speed up the RT-LBM computation on the GPU platform. The isotropic scattering is assumed in this study. The accuracy is evaluated using Monte Carlo method (MCM) simulations, showing RT-LBM is quite accurate when typical atmospheric coefficients of scattering and absorption are used. RT-LBM runs about 10 times faster than the MCM in a same CPU. When implemented on a NVidia Tesla V100 GPU in simulation with a large number of computation grid points, for example, RT-LBM runs similar to 120 times faster than running on a single CPU. The test results indicate RT-LBM is an accurate and fast model and is viable for simulating radiative transfer in the atmosphere with ranges for the isotropic atmosphere radiative parameters of albedo scattering (0.1 similar to 0.9) and optical depth (0.1 similar to 12).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available