4.6 Article

Selective Production of 2-Butanol from Hydrogenolysis of Levulinic Acid Catalyzed by the Non-precious NiMn Bimetallic Catalyst

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 9, Issue 46, Pages 15603-15611

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05771

Keywords

biomass; levulinic acid; 2-butanol; hydrogenolysis; DFT

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFD1100601]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878290]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, Ni-based bimetallic catalysts were prepared and the NiMn catalyst showed the highest efficiency with an 84.5% yield of 2-butanol under optimal conditions. The synergy between Ni-0 and Mn2+ species on the modified surface contributed to the high affinity of the catalyst towards adsorbing LA and LA-derived molecules, as confirmed by density functional theory calculations.
Selective production of 2-butanol from levulinic acid (LA) hydro-genolysis over a non-precious catalyst is long desirable. However, the process requires the precious metal Ru, and the yield of 2-butanol was less than 65%. Herein, we prepared Ni-based bimetallic catalysts, among which the NiMn catalyst exhibited the highest efficiency and reached an 84.5% yield of 2-butanol at 100% LA conversion under optimal conditions. The electronic states and surface properties were characterized by various techniques such as X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, temperature-programmed desorption, temperatureprogrammed reduction, and scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy. The high efficiency of the NiMn catalyst was due to the synergy between Ni-0 and Mn2+ species, and the modified surface showed a high basicity and a high affinity to adsorb LA and LA-derived molecules with C = O or COOH. The high affinity of the NiMn catalyst was further confirmed by density functional theory calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available