4.6 Article

Characterization of the Transpiration of a Vineyard under Different Irrigation Strategies Using Sap Flow Sensors

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13202867

Keywords

water consumption; evapotranspiration; evaporation; isohydric; anisohydric; vegetative growth

Funding

  1. INIA [GR18196]
  2. Junta de Extremadura [PRI IB10049]
  3. [AGA001]
  4. [LOI1202017/12]
  5. [LOI1302020/1]
  6. [RTA2012-00029-C02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focused on adjusting and evaluating sap flow sensors to determine transpiration in a vineyard, comparing data from the sensors with a weighing lysimeter and investigating the relationship between vegetative growth and transpiration under different water availability conditions. The results showed a good match between vine sap flow and transpiration, as well as a strong relationship between vegetative growth and vine transpiration.
Lysimeters are the reference method for determining ETc, but they are expensive and complex, which limits their use. The first objective of this work was to adjust and evaluate the robustness of sap flow sensors in order to determine the transpiration of a vineyard and, together with an evaporation model, to calculate the ETc of the vineyard. For this purpose, we compared water consumption data obtained from a vineyard weighing lysimeter (ETcLys) with the sum of transpiration obtained from sap flow sensors (T-SF) and evaporation estimated empirically over four years (2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015). The second objective was to obtain the relationship between the vegetative growth and transpiration of the vines with different water availability (irrigation and rainfed treatments), as an alternative method for estimating vine water needs adjusted to their real development. The third and last objective was to evaluate the transpiration response of the vines when subjected to water stress. We carried out the work in an experimental vineyard which has a well-established weighing lysimeter. As a result, a good match was obtained between vine sap flow and transpiration (R-2 = 0.85) as well as a good relationship between vegetative growth and vine transpiration (FiPAR: R-Irrigation(2) = 0.34. R-Rainfed(2) = 0.54; LAI: R-Irrigation(2) = 0.68. R-Rainfed(2) = 0.53).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available