4.6 Article

Integrated Multi-Attribute Preference Analysis in Fisheries and Solar Power Symbiosis Areas: A Case Study in Cigu, Taiwan

Journal

WATER
Volume 13, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13223265

Keywords

renewable energy; climate change; choice experiment; ecosystem conservation; solar energy generation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan) [MOST 109-2410-H-040-011-SS2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the FSPS development project in the Cigu region of Tainan City to analyze tradeoffs among ecosystem conservation, aquaculture, fisheries, and green energy development. Findings show low willingness to pay among tourists, importance placed on biodiversity improvement, and preference for minimal changes to the current status quo.
To achieve the 2025 Non-Nuclear Homeland goal and carbon emission mitigation target, the Taiwan government has been developing actively green and renewable energy with low carbon emissions. This study assessed the FSPS development project in the Cigu region of Tainan City to provide a thorough analysis toward making tradeoffs among ecosystem conservation, aquaculture, fisheries, and green power generation development. This study employs the choice experiment method and designs different attributes and levels to discuss the preferences of stakeholders in the policy development choices for ecosystem conservation and FSPS. The hope is that it can balance economic development and ecological conservation. The findings demonstrate that the tourists' marginal willingness to pay is low. The respondents then give importance to improving biodiversity. Finally, they prefer minimal changes to the status quo with the FSPS policy implementation. These findings can serve as a reference for decision making for regional sustainable development, aquaculture and fishery upgradation, and green power generation and exploitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available