4.6 Article

Assessing Community Disaster Resilience in Flood-Prone Areas of Bangladesh: From a Gender Lens

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14010040

Keywords

community resilience; gender; resilience assessment; flood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main purpose of this study was to assess the level of community flood resilience with a special focus on gender. The study used both quantitative and qualitative approaches to analyze 402 responses. It found that female members of the community lag in terms of disaster resilience compared to their male counterparts. This highlights the importance of adopting a gender-based approach when assessing community disaster resilience and introducing resilience enhancement interventions.
The main purpose of this study was to assess the level of community flood resilience with a special focus on gender. A gender perspective ensures the representation of diversified voices in the study. From concept development to data representation, all the steps were completed ensuring gender-based inclusion. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were used to conduct the study. A total of 402 responses were analyzed as the sample. A linear structured questionnaire was developed by using a five-point Likert scale to collect quantitative data. As part of the qualitative tool, in-depth observation was used in the study. The study found that female members of the community lag in terms of disaster resilience comparing to their male counterparts. The scores in different components of resilience assessment framework indicate that there are gaps in terms of level of resilience from the gender perspective. The same disaster can create a disproportionate level of impact on women and men due to an unequal level of resilience. The study indicates that assessing community disaster resilience and introducing resilience enhancement interventions should focus on a gender-based approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available