4.7 Article

Recombinant Production and Characterization of a New Toxin from Cryptops iheringi Centipede Venom Revealed by Proteome and Transcriptome Analysis

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13120858

Keywords

Cryptops iheringi; centipede; venom; toxin; transcriptome; proteome; recombinant protein; venomics; chilopoda

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2017/16999-8]
  2. National Coordination of High Education Personnel Formation Programs (CAPES-Demanda Social)
  3. FAPESP [2017/13812-4, 2013/07467-1]
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [312096/2018-6]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on the venom of Cryptops iheringi centipede involved transcriptomic characterization and proteomic analysis, revealing a novel potential toxin called Cryptoxin-1. The study linked this toxin to symptoms of envenomation and suggested the potential for exploring other proteins in the venom.
Among the Chilopoda class of centipede, the Cryptops genus is one of the most associated with envenomation in humans in the metropolitan region of the state of Sao Paulo. To date, there is no study in the literature about the toxins present in its venom. Thus, in this work, a transcriptomic characterization of the Cryptops iheringi venom gland, as well as a proteomic analysis of its venom, were performed to obtain a toxin profile of this species. These methods indicated that 57.9% of the sequences showed to be putative toxins unknown in public databases; among them, we pointed out a novel putative toxin named Cryptoxin-1. The recombinant form of this new toxin was able to promote edema in mice footpads with massive neutrophils infiltration, linking this toxin to envenomation symptoms observed in accidents with humans. Our findings may elucidate the role of this toxin in the venom, as well as the possibility to explore other proteins found in this work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available