4.7 Review

Khat, a Cultural Chewing Drug: A Toxicokinetic and Toxicodynamic Summary

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14020071

Keywords

cathinone; cathine; kinetics; toxicology; amphetamine-like; norpseudoephedrine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review paper summarizes current knowledge on the khat plant from a toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic perspective. The psychoactive effects of khat are primarily caused by its main constituents, cathinone, cathine, and norephedrine. Long-term use of khat is associated with severe physical and psychological complications.
Khat (Catha edulis) is a recreational, chewed herbal drug that has been used as a psychostimulant for centuries in East Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, namely in Somalia, Ethiopia, and Yemen. However, the growing worldwide availability of khat has produced widespread concern. The plant comprises a large number of active substances, among which cathinone, cathine, and norephedrine are the main constituents, which can be included in the group of sympathomimetics of natural origin. In fact, these compounds are amphetamine analogues, and, as such, they have amphetamine-like nervous system stimulant effects. Chewing the leaves gives people a sensation of well-being and increases energy, alertness, and self-confidence. The chronic use of khat is, however, associated with severe cardiac, neurological, psychological, and gastrointestinal complications. The psychological dependence and withdrawal symptoms of khat are the reasons for its prolonged use. The aim of this paper is to review current knowledge on the khat plant with toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic perspectives. Namely, this review paper addresses in vitro, in vivo, and human studies. The models used, as well as the concentrations and doses with the respective biological effects, are discussed. Additionally, the main drug interactions involved with khat are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available