4.7 Article

Assessment of CYGNSS Wind Speed Retrievals in Tropical Cyclones

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13245110

Keywords

CYGNSS; ocean surface winds; tropical cyclones; microwave remote sensing

Funding

  1. NASA Earth Science [NASA 80HQTR18C0033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While assessing various CYGNSS wind data records, significant biases and uncertainties were found in the high-wind products during tropical cyclones, whereas winds from NOAA showed promising skill in tropical cyclones.
The NASA CYGNSS satellite constellation measures ocean surface winds using the existing network of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and was designed for measurements in tropical cyclones (TCs). Here, we focus on using a consistent methodology to validate multiple CYGNSS wind data records currently available to the public, some focusing on low to moderate wind speeds, others for high winds, a storm-centric product for TC analyses, and a wind dataset from NOAA that applies a track-wise bias correction. Our goal is to document their differences and provide guidance to users. The assessment of CYGNSS winds (2017-2020) is performed here at global scales and for all wind regimes, with particular focus on TCs, using measurements from radiometers that are specifically developed for high winds: SMAP, WindSat, and AMSR2 TC-winds. The CYGNSS high-wind products display significant biases in TCs and very large uncertainties. Similar biases and large uncertainties were found with the storm-centric wind product. On the other hand, the NOAA winds show promising skill in TCs, approaching a level suitable for tropical meteorology studies. At the global level, the NOAA winds are overall unbiased at wind regimes from 0-30 m/s and were selected for a test assimilation into a global wind analysis, CCMP, also presented here.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available