4.7 Article

Vegetation Effects on Soil Moisture Retrieval from Water Cloud Model Using PALSAR-2 for Oil Palm Trees

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13204023

Keywords

SAR; backscattering; soil moisture content; LAI; HH and HV polarization

Funding

  1. Japanese Aerospace Agency (JAXA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the sensitivity of SAR signals to oil palm crops using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and in-situ observations. The results showed that HV polarization effectively simulated backscatter coefficient as compared to HH polarization with the best fit obtained by taking the LAI as a vegetation descriptor. HV polarization with the LAI indicator was able to retrieve soil moisture content with an accuracy of at least 80%.
In oil palm crop, soil fertility is less important than the physical soil characteristics. It is important to have a balance and sufficient soil moisture to sustain high yields in oil palm plantations. However, conventional methods of soil moisture determination are laborious and time-consuming with limited coverage and accuracy. In this research, we evaluated synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and in-situ observations at an oil palm plantation to determine SAR signal sensitivity to oil palm crop by means of water cloud model (WCM) inversion for retrieving soil moisture from L-band HH and HV polarized data. The effects of vegetation on backscattering coefficients were evaluated by comparing Leaf Area Index (LAI), Leaf Water Area Index (LWAI) and Normalized Plant Water Content (NPWC). The results showed that HV polarization effectively simulated backscatter coefficient as compared to HH polarization where the best fit was obtained by taking the LAI as a vegetation descriptor. The HV polarization with the LAI indicator was able to retrieve soil moisture content with an accuracy of at least 80%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available