4.7 Article

Quantifying the Variability of Phytoplankton Blooms in the NW Mediterranean Sea with the Robust Satellite Techniques (RST)

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13245151

Keywords

phytoplankton phenology; multi-sensor ocean colour data; long-term analysis; North-Western Mediterranean Sea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to evaluate phytoplankton phenology variability and anomalous blooms in the north-western Mediterranean Sea using robust satellite techniques. The OC-CCI derived chlorophyll-a anomaly index showed the best performance in characterizing anomalous blooms compared to in situ data. Intense convection events may lead to positive chlorophyll-a anomalies between the BOUSSOLE site and the Center of Convection Zone.
Investigating the variability of phytoplankton phenology plays a key role in regions characterized by cyclonic circulation regimes or convective events, like the north-western Mediterranean Sea (NWM). The main goal of this study is to assess the potential of the robust satellite techniques (RST) in identifying anomalous phytoplankton blooms in the NWM by using 9 years (2008-2017) of multi-sensor chlorophyll-a (chl-a) products from the CMEMS and OC-CCI datasets. Further application of the RST approach on a corresponding time-series of in situ chl-a measurements acquired at the BOUSSOLE site allows evaluation ofthe accuracy of the satellite-based change detection indices and selecting the best indicator. The OC-CCI derived chl-a anomaly index shows the best performances when compared to in situ data (R-2 and RMSE of 0.75 and 0.48, respectively). Thus, it has been used to characterize an anomalous chl-a bloom that occurred in March 2012 at regional scale. Results show positive chl-a anomalies between the BOUSSOLE site and the Center of Convection Zone (CCZ) as a possible consequence of an intense convection episode that occurred in February 2012.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available