4.7 Article

A New Method for UAV Lidar Precision Testing Used for the Evaluation of an Affordable DJI ZENMUSE L1 Scanner

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 13, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13234811

Keywords

UAV; lidar; precision; accuracy

Funding

  1. Grant Agency of CTU [SGS21/053/OHK1/1T/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a method using high-reflectivity foil-covered accurately georeferenced targets to verify the accuracy of UAV lidar systems. By comparing the lidar point cloud with a dense SfM point cloud, the systematic shift is successfully removed, revealing that the accuracy of the system is better than the manufacturer-declared values.
Lately, affordable unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-lidar systems have started to appear on the market, highlighting the need for methods facilitating proper verification of their accuracy. However, the dense point cloud produced by such systems makes the identification of individual points that could be used as reference points difficult. In this paper, we propose such a method utilizing accurately georeferenced targets covered with high-reflectivity foil, which can be easily extracted from the cloud; their centers can be determined and used for the calculation of the systematic shift of the lidar point cloud. Subsequently, the lidar point cloud is cleaned of such systematic shift and compared with a dense SfM point cloud, thus yielding the residual accuracy. We successfully applied this method to the evaluation of an affordable DJI ZENMUSE L1 scanner mounted on the UAV DJI Matrice 300 and found that the accuracies of this system (3.5 cm in all directions after removal of the global georeferencing error) are better than manufacturer-declared values (10/5 cm horizontal/vertical). However, evaluation of the color information revealed a relatively high (approx. 0.2 m) systematic shift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available