4.7 Article

The Accuracy of Precipitation Forecasts at Timescales of 1-15 Days in the Volta River Basin

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14040937

Keywords

weather forecasts; medium-range precipitation forecasts; Volta; global forecast system

Funding

  1. NASA Precipitation Measurement Mission [80NSSC19K0688]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the performance of the Global Forecast System (GFS) for precipitation forecasts in the Volta river basin in West Africa. The results show that the accuracy of the GFS forecasts varies depending on the climate zone, with underestimation bias in dry areas and overestimation bias in wet areas. However, aggregating the forecasts over longer timescales improves the skill of the GFS.
Medium-range (1-15 day) precipitation forecasts are increasingly available from global weather models. This study presents evaluation of the Global Forecast System (GFS) for the Volta river basin in West Africa. The evaluation was performed using two satellite-gauge merged products: NASA's Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals (IMERG) Final Run satellite-gauge merged rainfall observations, and the University of California Santa Barbara's Climate Hazard's group Infrared Precipitation with Stations (CHIRPS). The performance of GFS depends on the climate zone, with underestimation bias in the dry Sahel climate, overestimation bias in the wet Guinea Coastal climate, and relatively no bias in the moderately wet Savannah climate. Averaging rainfall over the watershed of the Akosombo dam (i.e., averaging across all three climate zones), the GFS forecast indicates low skill (Kling-Gupta Efficiency KGE = 0.42 to 0.48) for the daily, 1-day, lead GFS forecast, which deteriorates further as the lead time increases. A sharp decrease in KGE occurred between 6 to 10 days. Aggregating the forecasts over long timescales improves the accuracy of the GFS forecasts. On a 15-day accumulation timescale, GFS shows higher skills (KGE = 0.74 to 0.88).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available