4.7 Article

Comparison of Hemispheric and Regional Sea Ice Extent and Area Trends from NOAA and NASA Passive Microwave-Derived Climate Records

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14030619

Keywords

sea ice; remote sensing; passive microwave; Arctic; Antarctic; sea ice extent; sea ice area

Funding

  1. NOAA NCEI Climate Data Record Program [ST133017CQ0058, 1332KP19FNEEN0003]
  2. NASA Earth Science Data Information System (ESDIS) Project through the NASA Snow and Ice Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC) at NSIDC [80GSFC18C0102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares three passive microwave-based sea ice products, showing good consistency between them with strong negative trends in the Arctic and small positive trends in the Antarctic.
Three passive microwave-based sea ice products archived at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) are compared: (1) the NASA Team (NT) algorithm product, (2) Bootstrap (BT) algorithm product, and (3) a new version (Version 4) of the NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record (CDR) product. Most notable for the CDR Version 4 is the addition of the early passive microwave record, 1979 to 1987. The focus of this study is on long-term trends in monthly extent and area. In addition to hemispheric trends, regional analysis is also carried out, including use of a new Northern Hemisphere regional mask. The results indicate overall good consistency between the products, with all three products showing strong statistically significant negative trends in the Arctic and small borderline significant positive trends in the Antarctic. Regionally, the patterns are similar, except for a notable outlier of the NT area having a steeper trend in the Central Arctic, likely related to increasing surface melt. Other differences are due to varied approaches to quality control, e.g., weather filtering and correction of mixed land-ocean grid cells. Another factor, particularly in regards to NT trends with BT or CDR, is the inter-sensor calibration approach, which yields small discontinuities between the products. These varied approaches yield small differences in trends. In the Arctic, such differences are not critical, but in the Antarctic, where overall trends are near zero and borderline statistically significant, the differences are potentially important in the interpretation of trends.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available