4.7 Article

Alteration of Relative Rates of Biodegradation and Regeneration of Cervical Spine Cartilage through the Restoration of Arterial Blood Flow Access to Rhomboid Fossa: A Hypothesis

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 13, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13234248

Keywords

biodegradation rates; arterial hypertension; vertebral cartilage; rhomboid fossa

Funding

  1. RUDN University Strategic Academic Leadership Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The balance of biodegradation and regeneration rates in cervical spine cartilage is maintained by restoring arterial blood flow through cervical vertebral arteries, within the framework of the human body as a dissipative structure. Recovery of the body entails reducing decay rates below regeneration rates, achieved through redirecting inner dissipative flow. This proposed approach offers a reevaluation of dealing with various chronic diseases based on already collected data and scientific requirements.
We found the logical way to prove the existence of the mechanism that maintains the rates of biodegradation and regeneration of cervical spine cartilage. We demonstrate, that after we restore access to arterial blood flow through cervical vertebral arteries to rhomboid fossa it causes the prevalence of regeneration over biodegradation. This is in the frames of consideration of the human body as a dissipative structure. Then the recovery of the body should be considered as a reduction of the relative rates of decay below the regeneration ones. Then the recovery of cervical spine cartilage through redirecting of inner dissipative flow depends on the information about oxygen availability that is provided from oxygen detectors in the rhomboid fossa to the cerebellum. Our proposed approach explains already collected data, which satisfies all the scientific requirements. This allows us to draw conclusions that permit reconsidering the way of dealing with multiple chronic diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available