4.6 Article

A phylogenomic framework for charting the diversity and evolution of giant viruses

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001430

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Simons Early Career Award in Marine Microbial Ecology and Evolution
  2. NSF [IIBR-1918271]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of (National Library of Medicine) Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers conducted a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of Nucleocytoviricota, proposing giant virus orthologous groups and delineating 6 orders, 32 families, and 344 genera within this phylum, significantly expanding the recognized taxonomic ranks for these viruses. They integrated their results into a taxonomy adopted for all viruses to establish a unifying framework for studying Nucleocytoviricota diversity, evolution, and environmental distribution.
Large DNA viruses of the phylum Nucleocytoviricota have recently emerged as important members of ecosystems around the globe that challenge traditional views of viral complexity. Numerous members of this phylum that cannot be classified within established families have recently been reported, and there is presently a strong need for a robust phylogenomic and taxonomic framework for these viruses. Here, we report a comprehensive phylogenomic analysis of the Nucleocytoviricota, present a set of giant virus orthologous groups (GVOGs) together with a benchmarked reference phylogeny, and delineate a hierarchical taxonomy within this phylum. We show that the majority of Nucleocytoviricota diversity can be partitioned into 6 orders, 32 families, and 344 genera, substantially expanding the number of currently recognized taxonomic ranks for these viruses. We integrate our results within a taxonomy that has been adopted for all viruses to establish a unifying framework for the study of Nucleocytoviricota diversity, evolution, and environmental distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available