4.6 Review

Centromere function in asymmetric cell division in Drosophila female and male germline stem cells

Journal

OPEN BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.210107

Keywords

centromere; CENP-A; germline stem cell; asymmetric cell division; epigenetics; Drosophila

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland-PIYRA [13/YI/2187]
  2. Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship [GOIPG/2020/1113]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/YI/2187] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown that the distribution of CENP-A at the centromere can bias chromosome segregation in asymmetric cell division, which can affect cell fate in stem cells. These findings support the epigenetic regulation of asymmetric cell division through centromeres.
The centromere is the constricted chromosomal region required for the correct separation of the genetic material at cell division. The kinetochore protein complex assembles at the centromere and captures microtubules emanating from the centrosome to orchestrate chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Asymmetric cell division (ACD) is a special type of mitosis that generates two daughter cells with different fates. Epigenetic mechanisms operating at the centromere have been proposed to contribute to ACD. Recent studies have shown that an asymmetric distribution of CENP-A-the centromere-specific histone H3 variant-between sister chromatids can bias chromosome segregation in ACD. In stem cells, this leads to non-random sister chromatid segregation, which can affect cell fate. These findings support the 'silent sister' hypothesis, according to which the mechanisms of ACD are epigenetically regulated through centromeres. Here, we review the recent data implicating centromeres in ACDs and cell fate in Drosophila melanogaster female and male germline stem cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available