4.1 Article

Experimental Study of Earthquake Simulator for 3D Cold-Formed Steel Frame Structure

Journal

Publisher

LATIN AMER J SOLIDS STRUCTURES
DOI: 10.1590/1679-78256812

Keywords

Numerical simulation of CFS frame structures; Finite Element seismic analysis; Lightweight steel frame structures; Shaking table experiment

Funding

  1. Istanbul Development Agency [TR10/15/YNK/0034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents experimental and numerical analyses of cold-formed steel frame structures, aiming to improve their strength, rotation capacity, and seismic energy dissipation. The study includes shaking table tests on a three-story frame structure and FE analysis to validate the experimental results. The findings show the relationship between the maximum story drift ratio and earthquake acceleration records.
This paper aims to perform the experimental test and numerical FE analysis of the cold-formed steel frame structure to provide new proposals to improve the strength, rotation capacity, and seismic energy dissipation in these structures. A 3D full-scale three-story CFS frame structure is experimentally investigated under four sets of input data for 100% and 50% scales of Northridge and Kocaeli earthquake acceleration records using the shaking table test. In each test, the frame acceleration and displacement are observed. A FE model is employed to assert the validity of the experimental test. The results indicated that the maximum story drift ratio of the frame ranges from 1.14% to 3.70%. It is observed that the average similarity ratio of the maximum displacement results between FE analysis and shaking table test is 92%. It is shown that the translational stiffness for the system decrease as the earthquake acceleration records decrease. It is also shown that using the image processing technique in the shaking table test can offer much more acceptable and economical solutions in determining the displacement parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available