4.1 Review

The Effectiveness of Capnography Versus Pulse Oximetry in Detecting Respiratory Adverse Events in the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU): A Narrative Review and Synthesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 264-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2021.03.013

Keywords

capnography; end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring; PACU; pulse oximetry; ventilation

Categories

Funding

  1. American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of capnography monitoring compared to pulse oximetry monitoring in detecting respiratory adverse events in PACU. The findings suggest that capnography can improve the detection of respiratory adverse events in the PACU. However, due to the limited number of randomized controlled trials and variations in outcome measurements, meta-analysis was not possible.
Purpose: The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of capnography monitoring versus standard monitoring of pulse oximetry in detecting respiratory adverse events in nonintubated pediatric and adult postanesthesia care unit (PACU) patients. Design: Experimental, quasi-experimental, and observational studies examining pulse oximetry and capnography in adult and pediatric patients in the PACU were included in this systematic review. Methods: An initial search of MEDLINE and CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, Prospero, Google Scholar, and Cochrane was undertaken to identify articles on the topic. The text words contained in the titles and abstracts of relevant articles, and the index terms used to describe the articles were used to develop a full search strategy in July 2019. Reference lists of studies included at critical appraisal stage were hand-searched. Studies published in English from 1978 onward were included. Findings: Meta-analysis was not possible due to variation in outcome measurements; therefore, results are presented in narrative form. Four studies were included in the review: 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 3 observational cross-sectional studies. The RCT was considered of moderate to high quality, and the observational cross-sectional studies were of high quality. The main findings of this review suggest that there is limited high-quality evidence that capnography improves detection of respiratory adverse events in the PACU versus pulse oximetry. Conclusions: The lack of RCTs and varied outcomes measures in the 4 studies reviewed meant that meta-analysis was not possible. Early detection of respiratory adverse events afforded by the addition of PETCO2 to SpO2 in the PACU was seen in these studies. More research is needed to determine if widespread implementation of capnography in addition to pulse oximetry would reduce severity of respiratory related adverse events in the PACU through more timely identification. (c) 2021 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available