4.7 Article

Evaluation of antioxidants in protein formulation against oxidative stress using various biophysical methods

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.048

Keywords

Methionine; Protein oxidation; Antioxidants; RP-HPLC; DSC; DLS; CD

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2015R1A1A1A05000942]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the biophysical stability of protein against oxidative stress, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was used to induce non-site-specific protein oxidation. Various biophysical methods were utilized including RP-HPLC, DSC, DLS, and CD. Lysozyme was chosen as a model protein and three different antioxidants (ascorbic acid, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, and L-methionine) were selected to observe their effect. Significant increase in hydrodynamic size, decrease in a-helix propensity, and increase in beta-sheet content evident with increasing H2O2 concentration and temperature suggested methionine residues as the most probable site of oxidation. Among the three anti-oxidants, methionine proved superior in suppressing protein oxidation with its increasing concentration. Methionine reacted with H2O2 to form methionine sulfoxide, which aided in decreasing the oxidant concentration to react with the protein. The hydrodynamic size of methionine containing protein was retained when incubated at 40 degrees C after 14 days with unchanged transition temperature (T-m). In contrast, RP-HPLC revealed oxidation alterations when the same samples were stored at 40 degrees C, highlighting the significant impact of temperature on kinetics. N-acetyl-L-cysteine and ascorbic acid were relatively less protective. Their hydrodynamic size was increased with decreasing Tm compared to the reference. In summary, methionine was a superior antioxidant, implicating a promising component in the protein formulation for suppressing oxidation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available