4.4 Article

Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 480-487

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.12.003

Keywords

Community; CT; navigation; stakeholder; tobacco

Funding

  1. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [PP180025, PP190052]
  2. National Cancer Institute Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research [K24 CA201543-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By collaborating with community leaders and stakeholders, a community-based lung cancer screening program with telephone-based navigation and tobacco cessation counseling support was successfully implemented in rural areas. The program demonstrated feasibility and effectiveness in promoting awareness, increasing referrals, and completing LDCTs for eligible individuals.
Objective: Given the higher rates of tobacco use along with increased mortality specific to lung cancer in rural settings, low-dose CT (LDCT)-based lung cancer screening could be particularly beneficial to such populations. However, limited radiology facilities and increased geographical distance, combined with lower income and education along with reduced patient engagement, present heightened barriers to screening initiation and adherence. Methods: In collaboration with community leaders and stakeholders, we developed and implemented a community-based lung cancer screening program, including telephone-based navigation and tobacco cessation counseling support, serving 18 North Texas counties. Funding was available to support clinical services costs where needed. We collected data on LDCT referrals, orders, and completion. Results: To raise awareness for lung cancer screening, we leveraged our established collaborative network of more than 700 community partners. In the first year of operation, 107 medical providers referred 570 patients for lung cancer screening, of whom 488 (86%) were eligible for LDCT. The most common reasons for ineligibility were age (43%) and insufficient tobacco history (20%). Of 381 ordered LDCTs, 334 (88%) were completed. Among screened patients, 61% were current smokers and 36% had insurance coverage for the procedure. The program cost per patient was $430. Discussion: Implementation, uptake, and completion of LDCT-based lung cancer screening is feasible in rural settings. Community outreach, health promotion, and algorithm-based navigation may support such efforts. Given low lung cancer screening rates nationally and heightened lung cancer risk in rural populations, similar programs in other regions may be particularly impactful.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available