4.3 Article

Behavior Strategy Analysis Based on the Multi-Stakeholder Game under the Plastic Straw Ban in China

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312729

Keywords

plastic straw ban; straw substitute; multi-stakeholder behavior; evolutionary game

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [20BTQ059]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY22G010004]
  3. Project of China (Hangzhou) Cross-Border E-Commerce College [2021KXYJ07]
  4. Contemporary Business and Trade Research Center
  5. Center for Collaborative Innovation Studies of Modern Business of Zhejiang Gongshang University of China [14SMXY05YB]
  6. Hubei Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission and Manufacturing Engineering [MTMEOF2021A01]
  7. Characteristic and Preponderant Discipline of the Key Construction Universities in Zhejiang Province (Zhejiang Gongshang University, statistics)
  8. Collaborative Innovation Center of Statistical Data Engineering Technology and Application

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the strict ban on plastic straws and environmental policies, this study explores the game relationship between government, enterprises, and consumers. Government subsidies and penalties impact technological innovation and plastic alternatives development for enterprises, while consumer acceptance and online comments play a crucial role in shaping enterprises' research and development strategies.
Since 1 January 2021, China has banned nondegradable disposable straws in the catering industry. To promote the enforcement of the ban of plastic straws and improve the relationship between economic development and environmental protection, based on the evolutionary game method, this paper constructs the game model from the supply side and the demand side, respectively. Subsequently, through the dynamic equation, stable system evolution strategy is obtained. Furthermore, simulation is conducted to test the influence of the main parameters in the model on the evolution of system strategy. The results show that (1) the change of the government strategy mainly depends on its regulation costs and revenue, while the production strategy of a company is affected by the government and consumer strategies. (2) From the perspective of enterprise supply, government subsidies can promote technological innovation and develop new plastic straw substitutes. However, government penalties have little effect on violating enterprises. In addition, from the perspective of enterprise demand, with the collaboration of enterprises and consumers, it is easier for enterprises to carry out technological innovation. (3) Consumer acceptance of the substitutes for disposable plastic straws as well as online comments have a decisive influence on the enterprises' selections for research and development (R&D) strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available