4.3 Article

Open Issues and Practical Suggestions for Telemedicine in Chronic Pain

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312416

Keywords

chronic pain; telemedicine; healthcare delivery; health-related quality of life; functionality

Funding

  1. Grunenthal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Telemedicine offers a significant opportunity to improve care for patients with chronic pain, enhancing monitoring, treatment adherence, and personalized treatment. However, challenges remain in identifying assessment tools, implementing monitoring instruments, and finding the right balance between in-person visits and telemedicine. Additional data and dynamic protocols are needed to establish effective care pathways in chronic pain management.
Telemedicine represents a major opportunity to facilitate continued assistance for patients with chronic pain and improve their access to care. Preliminary data show that an improvement can be expected of the monitoring, treatment adherence, assessment of treatment effect including the emotional distress associated with pain. Moreover, this approach seems to be convenient and cost-effective, and particularly suitable for personalized treatment. Nevertheless, several open issues must be highlighted such as identification of assessment tools, implementation of monitoring instruments, and ability to evaluate personal needs and expectations. Open questions exist, such as how to evaluate the need for medical intervention and interventional procedures, and how to define when a clinical examination is required for certain conditions. In this context, it is necessary to establish dynamic protocols that provide the right balance between face-to-face visits and telemedicine. Useful tips are provided to start an efficient experience. More data are needed to develop precise operating procedures. In the meantime, the first experiences from such settings can pave the way to initiate effective care pathways in chronic pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available