4.3 Article

Safety and Efficacy of DOACs in Patients with Advanced and End-Stage Renal Disease

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031436

Keywords

direct oral anticoagulants; chronic kidney disease; end-stage renal disease; anticoagulation; hemodialysis; DOAC; CKD; ESRD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease is increasing due to aging population and risk factors. Impaired renal function increases the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. Vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants are two groups of drugs for preventing thromboembolic events, and DOACs have pleiotropic effects and comparable efficacy and safety in patients with CKD.
The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing due to the aging of the population and multiplication of risk factors, such as hypertension, arteriosclerosis and obesity. Impaired renal function increases both the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. There are two groups of orally administered drugs to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with CKD who require anticoagulation: vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Although VKAs remain the first-line treatment in patients with advanced CKD, treatment with VKAs is challenging due to difficulties in maintaining the appropriate anticoagulation level, tendency to accelerate vascular calcification and faster progression of CKD in patients treated with VKAs. On the other hand, the pleiotropic effect of DOACs, including vascular protection and anti-inflammatory properties along with comparable efficacy and safety of treatment with DOACs, compared to VKAs observed in preliminary reports encourages the use of DOACs in patients with CKD. This review summarizes the available data on the efficacy and safety of DOACs in patients with CKD and provides recommendations regarding the choice of the optimal drug and dosage depending on the CKD stage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available