4.3 Article

Music Listening and Homeostatic Regulation: Surviving and Flourishing in a Sonic World

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010278

Keywords

homeostasis; adaptive behavior; musical-aesthetic experience; musical reward; hedonic pleasure; eudaimonic enjoyment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper argues for a biological conception of music listening as an evolutionary achievement related to cognitive and emotional functions grounded in basic homeostatic regulation. Listeners are conceived as open systems continuously interacting with the sonic world, trying to maintain a controlled state of dynamic equilibrium by seeking out beneficial stimuli and avoiding harmful ones.
This paper argues for a biological conception of music listening as an evolutionary achievement that is related to a long history of cognitive and affective-emotional functions, which are grounded in basic homeostatic regulation. Starting from the three levels of description, the acoustic description of sounds, the neurological level of processing, and the psychological correlates of neural stimulation, it conceives of listeners as open systems that are in continuous interaction with the sonic world. By monitoring and altering their current state, they can try to stay within the limits of operating set points in the pursuit of a controlled state of dynamic equilibrium, which is fueled by interoceptive and exteroceptive sources of information. Listening, in this homeostatic view, can be adaptive and goal-directed with the aim of maintaining the internal physiology and directing behavior towards conditions that make it possible to thrive by seeking out stimuli that are valued as beneficial and worthy, or by attempting to avoid those that are annoying and harmful. This calls forth the mechanisms of pleasure and reward, the distinction between pleasure and enjoyment, the twin notions of valence and arousal, the affect-related consequences of music listening, the role of affective regulation and visceral reactions to the sounds, and the distinction between adaptive and maladaptive listening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available