4.3 Article

Do Parental Perceptions of the Nutritional Quality of School Meals Reflect the Food Environment in Public Schools?

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182010764

Keywords

school food; HHFKA; nutrition; perceptions

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [1R01HD071583-01A1]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL137814]
  3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that there is no significant association between parents' perception of the healthfulness of school meals and the actual nutritional quality of foods offered at schools.
(1) Background: It is unknown whether parents' perception of school meals, a determinant of student meal participation, align with the nutritional quality of meals served in schools. This study compares the healthfulness of foods offered in schools with parental perception of school meals at those same schools. (2) Method: Parents were asked to rate the healthfulness of school meals at their child's school. Data on the types of foods offered were collected from public schools in four cities in New Jersey and matched with parent-reported data. Measures were developed to capture the presence of healthy and unhealthy items in the National School Lunch Program and the presence of a la carte offerings as well as vending machines. Multivariable analysis examined the association between parental perceptions of school meals and the school food measures after adjusting for covariates. (3) Results: Measures of the school food environment and parental perceptions were available for 890 pre-K to 12th grade students. No significant associations were observed between parental perceptions and food environment measures when examined one by one or in a comprehensive model. (4) Conclusions: Parents' perception of the healthfulness of meals served do not align with the nutritional quality of foods offered at schools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available