4.5 Article

Hypermetabolic abdominal and cervical lymph nodes mimicking Hodgkin lymphoma relapse on FDG PET/CT after adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccine

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages 5129-5132

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2008215

Keywords

Lymphadenopathy; VAHL; Oxford-Astrazeneca vaccine; FDG PET; CT; Hodgkin Lymphoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This case report highlights a 33-year-old woman with a history of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma who developed hypermetabolic lymph nodes after receiving the adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccine, which were initially concerning for disease relapse but later resolved, emphasizing the importance of considering false positives in such scenarios.
Vaccine-associated hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy (VAHL) has been reported as a common post-vaccination side effect, especially with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Most VAHL cases present normal or enlarged regional lymph nodes close to the injection site, usually with mild-moderate FDG (18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose) uptake on FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Here, we describe the case of a 33-year-old woman with past history of Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (CHL) who underwent follow-up FDG PET/CT 3 days (d) after the first dose of the adenovirus-vectored Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. FDG PET/CT showed unexpected small hypermetabolic cervical and abdominal lymph nodes in the same location as at the onset of the disease, suggesting radiological relapse. Considering temporal relationship and other cases of VAHL, a new image was performed 2 months later, which revealed decreased lymph nodes and normalization of FDG uptake. This case illustrates that the possibility of a false-positive should always be considered by physicians in this new context, even when hypermetabolic lymph nodes appear far from the vaccination site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available