4.6 Article

Pre-evaluation of fault stability for underground mining based on geomechanical fault-slip analysis

Journal

GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 400-413

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2022.2032401

Keywords

Pre-mining; fault slip analysis; fault stability; mine disaster

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province of China [2020JJ5762]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52004332]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a technique for pre-mining evaluation of fault stability in underground near-fault mining. Through analyzing the effects of fault orientation, stress, and pore fluid pressure, a pre-evaluation on the stability of 15 faults in Shilin coal mine was conducted.
In underground near-fault mining, fault reactivation is related to many kinds of mine disasters such as mine water inrush, mine earthquakes, gas outburst, rock burst, roof collapse. pre-evaluation of fault stability in the pre-mining phase is of great significance for predicting possible mine fault-related disasters. In this study, based on the geomechanical analysis of fault slip tendency, a technique to the pre-mining evaluation of fault stability under Andersonian stress system was introduced by extending the original Morris's theory of fault slip-tendency, effects of fault orientation, in-situ stress and pore fluid pressure on fault stability were analyzed. Taking Shilin coal mine as the research background, a pre-evaluation on the stability of all 15 faults distributed in the whole coalfield at the mining depths of 369 and 514 m was conducted, the analysis results demonstrated that all faults in the Shilin coalfield are quite stable at the two mining depths. The work presented in this study is practical and can provide a quantitative geomechanical way in the analysis of pre-mining fault stability and in the risk pre-assessment of fault-related mine disasters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available