4.3 Article

Evolution of the canonical sex chromosomes of the guppy and its relatives

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab435

Keywords

sex chromosomes; recombination; sex determination; heterochiasmy; X chromosome; Y chromosome

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01-GM116853]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the sex chromosomes of the guppy and its close relatives, finding no evidence of a nonrecombining sex-determining region and suggesting that the evolution of sex-determining regions in certain relatives occurred independently. It also addresses conflicting results in previous studies and proposes best practices for future research.
The sex chromosomes of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, and its close relatives are of particular interest: they are much younger than the highly degenerate sex chromosomes of model systems such as humans and Drosophila melanogaster, and they carry many of the genes responsible for the males' dramatic coloration. Over the last decade, several studies have analyzed these sex chromosomes using a variety of approaches including sequencing genomes and transcriptomes, cytology, and linkage mapping. Conflicting conclusions have emerged, in particular concerning the history of the sex chromosomes and the evolution of suppressed recombination between the X and Y. Here, we address these controversies by reviewing the evidence and reanalyzing data. We find no evidence of a nonrecombining sex-determining region or evolutionary strata in P. reticulata. Furthermore, we find that the data most strongly support the hypothesis that the sex-determining regions of 2 close relatives of the guppy, Poecilia wingei and Micropoecilia picta, evolved independently after their lineages diverged. We identify possible causes of conflicting results in previous studies and suggest best practices going forward.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available