4.3 Article

The recombination landscapes of spiny lizards (genus Sceloporus)

Journal

G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab402

Keywords

recombination; spiny lizards; Sceloporus jarrovii; Sceloporus megalepidurus

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CAREER grant [DEB-2045343]
  2. National Science Foundation [DEB-1754125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite limited knowledge about rates of recombination in most species, including squamate reptiles, studying recombination maps in spiny lizards can provide insights into the causes and consequences of rate variation, determinants of within-genome rate variation, and the general tempo of recombination rate evolution.
Despite playing a critical role in evolutionary processes and outcomes, relatively little is known about rates of recombination in the vast majority of species, including squamate reptiles-the second largest order of extant vertebrates, many species of which serve as important model organisms in evolutionary and ecological studies. This paucity of data has resulted in limited resolution on questions related to the causes and consequences of rate variation between species and populations, the determinants of within-genome rate variation, as well as the general tempo of recombination rate evolution on this branch of the tree of life. In order to address these questions, it is thus necessary to begin broadening our phylogenetic sampling. We here provide the first fine-scale recombination maps for two species of spiny lizards, Sceloporus jarrovii and Sceloporus megalepidurus, which diverged at least 12 Mya. As might be expected from similarities in karyotype, population-scaled recombination landscapes are largely conserved on the broad-scale. At the same time, considerable variation exists at the fine-scale, highlighting the importance of incorporating species-specific recombination maps in future population genomic studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available