4.7 Article

Effects of Buried Wood on the Development of Populus tremuloides on Various Oil Sands Reclamation Soils

Journal

FORESTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f13010042

Keywords

buried wood; land reclamation; reclamation soils; trembling aspen; tree growth

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that buried wood is an important component of reclamation soils, primarily inputting carbon to the soil and affecting plant growth through increasing the C:N ratio and reducing available nitrogen. Soil type is the main factor influencing trembling aspen growth, while buried wood species does not impact aspen development, but the amount of buried wood does. Adding wood content significantly slows down aspen growth on more productive soils.
Buried wood is an important but understudied component of reclamation soils. We examined the impacts of buried wood amounts and species on the growth of the common reclamation tree species trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). In a greenhouse study, aspen seedlings were planted into four soil types, upland derived fine forest floor-mineral mix (fFFMM), coarse forest floor-mineral mix (cFFMM), and lowland derived peat and peat-mineral mix (PMM), that were mixed with either aspen or pine wood shavings at four concentrations (0%, 10%, 20% and 50% of total volume). Height and diameter growth, chlorophyll concentration, and leaf and stem biomass were measured. Soil nutrients and chemical properties were obtained from a parallel study. Buried wood primarily represents an input of carbon to the soil, increasing the C:N ratio, reducing the soil available nitrogen and potentially reducing plant growth. Soil type had the largest impact on aspen growth with fFFMM = peat > PMM > cFFMM. Buried wood type, i.e., aspen or pine, did not have an impact on aspen development, but the amount of buried wood did. In particular, there was an interaction between wood amount and soil type with a large reduction in aspen growth with wood additions of 10% and above on the more productive soils, but no reduction on the less productive soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available