4.5 Article

Killer whale (Orcinus orca) population dynamics in response to a period of rapid ecosystem change in the eastern North Atlantic

Journal

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
Volume 11, Issue 23, Pages 17289-17306

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8364

Keywords

abundance; apparent survival; capture heterogeneity; killer whale; photo-identification; population dynamics

Funding

  1. Alfred Kordelinin Saatio
  2. Finnish-Norwegian Cultural Foundation
  3. Tampereen Sarkanniemi
  4. Sea World and Parks Entertainment
  5. Spare Bank-1 Nord Norge
  6. WWF Sweden
  7. University of St Andrews
  8. Russell Trust Award
  9. Discovery Initiatives
  10. SMRU Ltd.
  11. Academy of Finland
  12. Norges Forskningsrad
  13. Sea World and Busch Gardens Conservation Fund
  14. Havforskningsinstituttet
  15. Canon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the survival and abundance of killer whales in Norway from 1988 to 2019 using capture-recapture models, revealing differences between two time periods. The findings suggest that killer whales have adapted their distribution in response to shifts in key prey resources, which highlights their potential to adjust to rapidly changing marine ecosystems. The study also indicates variations in the proportion of killer whales within undefined populations in a larger geographical region.
This study investigates survival and abundance of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Norway in 1988-2019 using capture-recapture models of photo-identification data. We merged two datasets collected in a restricted fjord system in 1988-2008 (Period 1) with a third, collected after their preferred herring prey shifted its wintering grounds to more exposed coastal waters in 2012-2019 (Period 2), and investigated any differences between these two periods. The resulting dataset, spanning 32 years, comprised 3284 captures of 1236 whales, including 148 individuals seen in both periods. The best-supported models of survival included the effects of sex and time period, and the presence of transients (whales seen only once). Period 2 had a much larger percentage of transients compared to Period 1 (mean = 30% vs. 5%) and the identification of two groups of whales with different residency patterns revealed heterogeneity in recapture probabilities. This caused estimates of survival rates to be biased downward (females: 0.955 +/- 0.027 SE, males: 0.864 +/- 0.038 SE) compared to Period 1 (females: 0.998 +/- 0.002 SE, males: 0.985 +/- 0.009 SE). Accounting for this heterogeneity resulted in estimates of apparent survival close to unity for regularly seen whales in Period 2. A robust design model for Period 2 further supported random temporary emigration at an estimated annual probability of 0.148 (+/- 0.095 SE). This same model estimated a peak in annual abundance in 2015 at 1061 individuals (95% CI 999-1127), compared to a maximum of 731 (95% CI 505-1059) previously estimated in Period 1, and dropped to 513 (95% CI 488-540) in 2018. Our results indicate variations in the proportion of killer whales present of an undefined population (or populations) in a larger geographical region. Killer whales have adjusted their distribution to shifts in key prey resources, indicating potential to adapt to rapidly changing marine ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available