4.3 Article

The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 295-304

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1128124

Keywords

Cochlear implant; fluctuating noise; electrical dynamic range; speech understanding

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within Munich Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience [01GQ1004B]
  2. DFG Ultrafast and temporally precise information processing: normal and dysfunctional hearing [SPP 1608, HE6713/1-1, HE6713/1-2]
  3. MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The present study evaluated whether the poorer baseline performance of cochlear implant (CI) users or the technical and/or physiological properties of CI stimulation are responsible for the absence of masking release. Design: This study measured speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in continuous and modulated noise as a function of signal to noise ratio (SNR). Study sample: A total of 24 subjects participated: 12 normal-hearing (NH) listeners and 12 subjects provided with recent MED-EL CI systems. Results: The mean SRT of CI users in continuous noise was -3.0 +/- 1.5 dB SNR (mean +/- SEM), while the normal-hearing group reached -5.9 +/- 0.8 dB SNR. In modulated noise, the difference across groups increased considerably. For CI users, the mean SRT worsened to -1.4 +/- 2.3 dB SNR, while it improved for normal-hearing listeners to -18.9 +/- 3.8 dB SNR. Conclusions: The detrimental effect of fluctuating maskers on SRTs in CI users shown by prior studies was confirmed by the current study. Concluding, the absence of masking release is mainly caused by the technical and/or physiological properties of CI stimulation, not just the poorer baseline performance of many CI users compared to normal-hearing subjects. Speech understanding in modulated noise was more robust in CI users who had a relatively large electrical dynamic range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available