4.3 Article

A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 358-365

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1137362

Keywords

Speech in noise; digits; triplets; coarticulation; interrupted noise; diotic; dichotic

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIH/NIDCD) [R43 DC009719]
  2. Indiana University
  3. Communication Disorders Technology, Inc.
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R43DC009719] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The Dutch digits-in-noise test (NL DIN) and the American-English version (US DIN) are speech-in-noise tests for diagnostic and clinical usage. The present study investigated differences between NL DIN and US DIN speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for a group of native Dutch-speaking listeners. Design: In experiment 1, a repeated-measures design was used to compare SRTs for the NL DIN and US DIN in steady-state noise and interrupted noise for monaural, diotic, and dichotic listening conditions. In experiment 2, a subset of these conditions with additional speech material (i.e. US DIN triplets without inter-digit coarticulation/prosody) was used. Study sample: Experiment 1 was conducted with 16 normal-hearing Dutch students. Experiment 2 was conducted with nine different students. Results: No significant differences between SRTs measured with the NL DIN and US DIN were found in steady-state noise. In interrupted noise the US DIN SRTs were significantly better in monaural and diotic listening conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated that these better SRTs cannot be explained by the combined effect of inter-digit coarticulation and prosody in the American-English triplets. Conclusions: The NL DIN and US DIN are highly comparable and valuable tests for measuring auditory speech recognition abilities. These tests promote across-language comparisons of results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available