4.5 Article

Frequency-based ensemble forecasting model for time series forecasting

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40314-022-01765-x

Keywords

Time series; Forecasting; M4 competition; Frequency; Ensemble model; Statistical methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces the model used in the M4 forecasting competition, which combines several statistical methods and outperforms the benchmarks in terms of forecasting accuracy. The proposed model is also compared with other forecasting methods and shown to produce accurate results.
The M4 forecasting competition challenged the participants to forecast 100,000 time series with different frequencies: hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, and yearly. These series come mainly from the economic, finance, demographics, and industrial areas. This paper describes the model used in the competition, which is a combination of statistical methods, namely auto-regressive integrated moving-average, exponential smoothing (ETS), bagged ETS, temporal hierarchical forecasting method, Box-Cox transformation, ARMA errors, Trend and Seasonal components (BATS), and Trigonometric seasonality BATS (TBATS). Forty-nine submissions were evaluated by the organizers and compared with 12 benchmarks and standards for comparison forecasting methods. Based on the results, the proposed model is listed among the 17 submissions that outperform the 12 benchmarks and standards for comparison forecasting methods, ranked 15th on average and 4th with the weekly time series. In addition, a further comparison was conducted between the proposed model and other forecasting methods on forecasting EUR/USD exchange rate and Bitcoin closing price time series. It is apparent from the results that the proposed model can produce accurate results compared to many forecasting methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available