4.5 Review

Sulfur Dioxide Capture in Metal-Organic Frameworks, Metal-Organic Cages, and Porous Organic Cages

Journal

CHEMPLUSCHEM
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cplu.202200006

Keywords

material science; metal-organic cages; metal-organic frameworks; porous organic cages; SO2 adsorption

Funding

  1. DGAPA-UNAM (PAPIIT), Mexico [IN202820]
  2. CONACyT [733072, 766200, 770954]
  3. University of Science and Technology [2021205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article focuses on the adsorption characteristics of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in porous materials such as metal-organic frameworks, metal-organic cages, and porous organic cages under reversible conditions. The preferential binding sites in these materials are highlighted, providing valuable information on the progress made towards improving SO2 capture by hybrid systems.
Capture, storage and subsequent controlled release or transformation of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in mild conditions is still a challenge in the material science field. Recent advances in the use of porous materials have demonstrated good SO2 capture, particularly in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), metal-organic cages (MOCs), and porous organic cages (POCs). The striking feature of these porous materials is the high SO2 uptake capacity in reversible settings. A partially fluorinated MIL-101(Cr) is stand-alone material with the highest SO2 uptake in chemically stable MOFs. Likewise, metal-free adsorbents like POCs exhibits a reversible SO2 uptake behavior. The SO2 adsorption characteristics of these three structurally and functionally unique adsorbent systems are highly dependent on the binding sites and mode of binding of SO2 molecules. This Review has highlighted the preferential binding sites in these materials to give a full perspective on the field. We anticipate that it will offer valuable information on the progress made towards improving SO2 capture by hybrid systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available