4.8 Article

An anaphase surveillance mechanism prevents micronuclei formation from frequent chromosome segregation errors

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109783

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) consolidator grant CODECHECK, under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [681443]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia of Portugal [PTDC/MED-ONC/3479/2020]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/MED-ONC/3479/2020] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aurora B kinase plays a crucial role in human cell division by actively monitoring and correcting frequent chromosome segregation errors to prevent micronuclei formation.
Micronuclei are a hallmark of cancer and several other human disorders. Recently, micronuclei were implicated in chromothripsis, a series of massive genomic rearrangements that may drive tumor evolution and progression. Here, we show that Aurora B kinase mediates a surveillance mechanism that integrates error correction during anaphase with spatial control of nuclear envelope reassembly to prevent micronuclei formation. Using high-resolution live-cell imaging of human cancer and non-cancer cells, we uncover that anaphase lagging chromosomes are more frequent than previously anticipated, yet they rarely form micronuclei. Micronuclei formation from anaphase lagging chromosomes is prevented by a midzone-based Aurora B phosphorylation gradient that stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments and assists spindle forces required for anaphase error correction while delaying nuclear envelope reassembly on lagging chromosomes, independently of micro tubule density. We propose that a midzone-based Aurora B phosphorylation gradient actively monitors and corrects frequent chromosome segregation errors to prevent micronuclei formation during human cell division.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available