4.8 Article

Pre-existing chromatin accessibility and gene expression differences among naive CD4+ T cells influence effector potential

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 37, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110064

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Doctoral Award (CIHR)
  2. Tomlinson Doctoral Fellowship (McGill)
  3. Cole Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. NOW Vici grant [016.140.655]
  5. NSERC [201603808]
  6. McGill start-up fund
  7. Cancer Research Society [22344]
  8. CIHR [PJT-168862]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that pre-existing transcriptional and chromatin landscape differences among naive CD4(+) T cells impact their effector potential, with some cells showing a tendency towards follicular helper T cell lineage. Furthermore, the strength of TCR signal during thymic development plays a crucial role in establishing chromatin landscapes that ultimately shape the effector potential of naive CD4(+) T cells.
CD4(+) T cells have a remarkable potential to differentiate into diverse effector lineages following activation. Here, we probe the heterogeneity present among naive CD4(+) T cells before encountering their cognate antigen to ask whether their effector potential is modulated by pre-existing transcriptional and chromatin landscape differences. Single-cell RNA sequencing shows that key drivers of variability are genes involved in T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Using CD5 expression as a readout of the strength of tonic TCR interactions with self-peptide MHC, and sorting on the ends of this self-reactivity spectrum, we find that pre-existing transcriptional differences among naive CD4(+) T cells impact follicular helper T (T-FH) cell versus non-T-FH effector lineage choice. Moreover, our data implicate TCR signal strength during thymic development in establishing differences in naive CD4(+) T cell chromatin landscapes that ultimately shape their effector potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available