4.6 Article

Readiness of health facilities to provide emergency obstetric care in Papua New Guinea: evidence from a cross-sectional survey

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050150

Keywords

obstetrics; international health services; quality in health care; health policy; maternal medicine

Funding

  1. World Bank's Trust Fund - Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
  2. World Bank [7171956]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measured the readiness of health facilities in Papua New Guinea to provide obstetric care and other maternal health services. The results showed that many facilities, especially at the lower levels, were not able to provide basic emergency obstetric care. To improve access to obstetric care, it is necessary to upgrade level 3 and 4 facilities to at least basic emergency obstetric care providers, and an optimal geographic location approach can be used to identify facilities that need to be upgraded.
Objective To measure the readiness of health facilities in Papua New Guinea (PNG) to provide obstetric care and other maternal health services. Design Cross-sectional study involving random sample of health centres, district/rural hospitals (levels 3 and 4 facilities) and all upper-level hospitals operational at the time of survey. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data from health facilities. Setting Health facilities in PNG. Facility administrators and other facility personnel were interviewed. Number of facility personnel interviewed was usually one for health centres and two or more for hospitals. Participants 19 upper-level facilities (levels 5-7, provincial, regional and national hospitals) and 60 lower-level facilities (levels 3 and 4, health centres and district/rural hospitals). Outcome measures Four service-types were used to understand readiness of surveyed health facilities in the provision of maternity care including obstetric care services: (1) facility readiness to provide clinical services; (2) availability of family planning items; (3) availability of maternal and neonatal equipment and materials; and (4) ability to provide emergency obstetric care (EmOC). Results 56% of lower-level facilities were not able to provide basic emergency obstetric care (BEmOC). Even among higher-level facilities, 16% were not able to perform one or more of the functions required to be considered a BEmOC provider. 11% of level 3 and 4 health facilities were able to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC) as compared with 83% of higher-level facilities. Conclusion Given the high fertility rate and maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in PNG, lack of BEmOC at the first level inpatient service providers is a major concern. To improve access to EmOC, level 3 and 4 facilities should be upgraded to at least BEmOC providers. Significant reduction in MMR will require improved access to CEmOC and optimal geographic location approach can identify facilities to be upgraded.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available