4.6 Article

Changes in youth care use after the implementation of community-based support teams: repeated measurement study using registry data and data on team characteristics

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048933

Keywords

mental health; child & adolescent psychiatry; public health; organisation of health services

Funding

  1. ZonMw, The Netherlands [73720.0006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The implementation of community-based support teams in the Netherlands, in accordance with the new Youth Act, resulted in changes in youth care use. The study found an increase in the use of primary youth care, a decrease in specialized youth care, and a slight increase in residential youth care. Additionally, younger children showed an increase in youth care use over time.
Objectives New legislation on youth care in the Netherlands led to the implementation of community-based support teams, providing integrated primary youth care. Important aims of the new Youth Act were more integrated, timely care and less use of intensive forms of care. Our aim was to study changes in youth care use in time and the role of newly introduced community-based support teams herein. Setting Register data (2015-2018) on youth of a large city were linked and combined with administrative and aggregated data on team characteristics. Participants Data on 126 095 youth (0-18 years) were available for analyses. Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary, specialised and residential youth care use were the primary outcomes. Results Generalised estimating equations analyses adjusted for individual characteristics demonstrated that over 4 years, use of primary youth care increased from 2.2% to 8.5% (OR 1.70; 99% CI 1.67 to 1.73), specialised youth care decreased from 7.2% to 6.4% (OR 0.98; 99% CI 0.97 to 1.00) and residential youth care increased slightly (OR 1.04; 99% CI 1.01 to 1.06). Gender, age, family status, migrant background and educational level were all associated with the types of youth care use and also with some trends in time. Likelihood to receive care increased in time for preschool and younger children but did not improve for migrant children. Case load, team size, team turnover, team performance and transformational leadership showed significant associations with different types of youth care use but hardly with trends in time. Conclusion Patterns of youth care use changed towards more locally provided primary youth care, slightly less specialised and slightly more residential youth care. Furthermore, youth care use among younger children increased in time. These trends are partly in line with the trends intended by the Youth Act. Little evidence was found for the role of specific team characteristics on changes in youth care use in time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available