4.6 Article

Decision (not) to disclose mental health conditions or substance abuse in the work environment: a multiperspective focus group study within the military

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049370

Keywords

mental health; substance misuse; occupational & industrial medicine; qualitative research; human resource management

Funding

  1. IMPACT PhD Programme 2018 of Tilburg University
  2. Dutch Ministry of Defence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explored barriers to and facilitators for disclosure of mental health conditions and substance abuse in the military, finding that fear of stigma and discrimination were significant barriers across all perspectives. Supervisor support and workplace culture were identified as critical factors influencing disclosure, indicating the key role supervisors play in improving health, well-being, and sustainable employment for soldiers with MHC/SA. Policy adjustments at the military level could help alleviate fears associated with disclosure, ultimately promoting a more supportive environment for soldiers.
Objectives Many workers in high-risk occupations, such as soldiers, are exposed to stressors at work, increasing their risk of developing mental health conditions and substance abuse (MHC/SA). Disclosure can lead to both positive (eg, support) and negative (eg, discrimination) work outcomes, and therefore, both disclosure and non-disclosure can affect health, well-being and sustainable employment, making it a complex dilemma. The objective is to study barriers to and facilitators for disclosure in the military from multiple perspectives. Design Qualitative focus groups with soldiers with and without MHC/SA and military mental health professionals. Sessions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was done using a general inductive approach. Setting The study took place within the Dutch military. Participants In total, 46 people participated in 8 homogeneous focus groups, including 3 perspectives: soldiers with MHC/SA (N=20), soldiers without MHC/SA (N=10) and military mental health professionals (N=16). Results Five barriers for disclosure were identified (fear of career consequences, fear of social rejection, lack of leadership support, lack of skills to talk about MHC/SA, masculine workplace culture) and three facilitators (anticipated positive consequences of disclosure, leadership support, work-related MHC/SA). Views of the stakeholder groups were highly congruent. Conclusions Almost all barriers (and facilitators) were related to fear for stigma and discrimination. This was acknowledged by all three perspectives, suggesting that stigma and discrimination are considerable barriers to sustainable employment and well-being. Supervisor knowledge, attitudes and behaviour were critical for disclosure, and supervisors thus have a key role in improving health, well-being and sustainable employment for soldiers with MHC/SA. Furthermore, adjustments could be made by the military on a policy level, to take away some of the fears that soldiers have when disclosing MHC/SA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available