4.4 Article

Understanding and design of efficient carrier-selective contacts for solar cells

Journal

AIP ADVANCES
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0063915

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201027]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [61774069]
  3. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Education Department
  4. Lianyungang Haiyan Plan [2020-QD-010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient carrier-selective contacts require consideration of electron conductivity, hole conductivity, work function of materials, as well as band alignment between absorbers and contact layers.
Numerous efforts have been devoted to either understanding or fabricating efficient carrier-selective contacts, since they play a significantly crucial role in high-performance solar cells. In this work, we demonstrate that the asymmetry between electron conductivity and hole conductivity is important but far not enough for efficient carrier-selective contacts. Taking electron-selective contacts as examples, cell performances are greatly affected by the electron conductivity, the hole conductivity, and the work function of electron-selective materials, together with conduction and valance band offset between absorbers and electron-selective layers. When designing efficient electron-selective contacts, all these factors should be considered to mitigate carrier recombination and downward bending of the electron quasi-Fermi level within and around the contacts and to ensure low interfacial resistance for electrons. Although the absorber is crystalline silicon in the study, we believe that our understanding and design guidelines are also applicable to solar cells based on other absorbers. (c) 2021 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available