4.5 Article

Minimally Invasive Contralateral Over-the-Top Approach for Lumbar Calcified Foraminal Lesions: A Technical Note

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 155, Issue -, Pages 77-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.025

Keywords

Contralateral; Decompression; Lumbar; Minimally invasive; Tubular

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study successfully removed calcified disc herniations in two patients with radiculopathy using a contralateral tubular approach, with positive early clinical and radiological outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques have been described to address intraforaminal/extraforaminal lumbar lesions. They vary from the classic posterior open approaches to minimally invasive techniques with tubular retractors and even endoscopy. These lesions have been approached from either an ipsilateral or a contralateral approach. Only a few reports have described a contralateral minimally invasive tubular approach to address these lesions. However, none of them have been able to address calcified pathologies. METHOD: We used a contralateral tubular approach to remove the calcified disc herniations in 2 patients presenting with radiculopathy secondary to a calcified intraforaminal L5-S1 disc herniation. RESULTS: Early clinical and radiological outcomes were positive. No perioperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of the expanded use of fixed tubular retractors to address calcified lumbar intraforaminal disc herniations. This approach allows a satisfactory access and view of the contralateral foramen and offending lesion. It permits a wide decompression while preserving the facet joint and thus prevents iatrogenic instability. It can also avoid the iliac crest, which does not allow an ipsilateral extraforaminal approach at the L5-S1 level. This approach is a safe and effective way to treat this specific pathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available