4.7 Article

The limitations of patient-centered care: The case of early long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) removal

Journal

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114632

Keywords

Patient -centered care; Clinicians; Long-acting reversible contraception; Reproduction; Qualitative; United States

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article explores the implementation of patient-centered care in the context of contraception, specifically early removals of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). The study reveals that healthcare providers, despite claiming to embrace patient-centeredness, often neglect patient preferences and needs when it comes to early LARC removals. Providers employ various strategies to resist removal requests and even use patient-centered care principles to undermine them. These findings highlight the challenges in implementing patient-centered care and emphasize the importance of enhanced training, specificity, and institutionalization of patient-centered models of care, as well as improving patient-provider exchanges.
Patient-centered care (PCC) is frequently recommended to improve healthcare outcomes in the United States. Despite its purported benefits, little research explores how and to what extent providers implement this model in their care. We examine such processes through the case of contraception, specifically, early removals of longacting reversible contraception (LARC). In-depth interviews with 51 healthcare providers reveal that while providers describe embracing patient-centeredness when considering patients' early LARC removal requests, their implementation ironically sidelines patient preferences and needs. Rather than be responsive to patients' requests, all providers in the study resist early LARC removal by: withholding information about self-removal of intrauterine devices (IUDs); negotiating with patients to keep their device longer; setting subjective timelines to prolong LARC use; and/or engaging in delay tactics to wear down patients' resolve for removal. Furthermore, beyond simply resisting LARC removal requests using these strategies, providers purposively employ tenets of PCC to sway patients away from removal. In other words, providers utilize PCC as a means to undermine it. Understanding how providers implement patient-centered care reveals the challenges to doing so, even in cases like early LARC removal where providers indicate patient-centeredness is a priority. It also elucidates the need for enhanced training, specificity, and institutionalization around patient-centered models of care; informs interventions that promote LARC use among patients; as well as offers opportunities for improving patient-provider exchanges generally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available